<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>burkeware.com &#187; code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/category/code/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.burkeware.com</link>
	<description>Writing buggy code, so you don't have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Improving OpenMRS Code Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/118</link>
		<comments>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openmrs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to figure out how we can improve the efficiency of our code reviews.&#160; Finding some interesting stuff on the web&#8230; Like this article: Limit the checklist to 7±2 items.&#160; Automate the automate-able and let existing code review data drive the list of common mistakes. Here is a list of articles, white-papers, and documentation around [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/118/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Translating Listserv archive to mbox format</title>
		<link>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/85</link>
		<comments>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/85#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groovy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We wanted to import our old mailing list entries from the OpenMRS mailing list Listserv archives into Nabble.&#160; No problem.&#160; Finding the GET listname FILELIST and GET listname file1, GET listname file2, &#8230; commands was easy enough.&#160; A quick search of Nabble support made it clear that I needed to send them mbox files.&#160; So, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/85/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ReviewBoard for OpenMRS GSoC 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/22</link>
		<comments>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/22#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openmrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burkeware.com/blog/archives/22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the generous folks at Review Board, OpenMRS has the opportunity to try out Review Board for performing code reviews for our GSoC projects. Students can download post -review (a python script) and submit changes for review simply by issuing the command &#8220;post-review&#8221; within the root of their local copy. Mentors can review the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.burkeware.com/archives/22/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
